Playboy seemed very polished to me - it was always the thickest yet seemed to have the least content - both pictorials and otherwise. And it all depended on the issue, years and photographers. I have not bothered to pick up any of these magazines in many, many years - so you have to deal with my "when I was a kid" review: I first saw all of these magazines when I was a boy. I doubt I'll ever buy another Playboy unless someone I know is in it (which has happened off and on over the last 3 years or so)⦠If I had to purchase one of the three, it would likely be Penthouse. Were it not for the subscription that continues to be sent to me (it should have ended long ago, they just keep sending them), I wouldn't pick up Penthouse either for the same reasons. But in this day and age of free, unlimited content on the web, I'd never buy the magazine. When there's⦠ah⦠"business to attend to" Hustler is the magazine. Hustler? It's like Penthouse was back when I was in college in the latter half of the '90s. I like that the visual aspects of the photography is no longer predictable from magazine to magazine. 5 years ago it was far too tame for my tastes just Playboy with a different name. I hated it for a couple of years but it's content has improved. I stumbled into a subscription to Penthouse five years ago right at the beginning of their overhaul. I still have about 80 or so collecting dust. All it had was pretty pictures and ones that really didn't do it for me. It didn't have the health/exercise expertise of Men's Health. Wasn't on top of current events the way Newsweek etc was (or, more recently, any of the news sites which are up to the second). As such, Playboy didn't have the articles or provide the fashion assistance that GQ or Esquire did. But personally, "things" or "stuff" have no value to me aside from application. I approached it from the prevailing view that collectibles have some sort of value in the long term like stamps. I did so for many years because it was Playboy. Also, as it relates to class⦠or so-called "class" rather⦠I mean, heaven forbid a woman should actually relish being viewed objectively, right? Heaven forbid that a woman should own her sexuality and enjoy a more carnal exposure of self, right? I suppose that allowing her anus to be depicted in a sexual manner means that she categorically lacks class, right? When I was in college, I used to collect Playboy. The country is leading them at this point. On the contrary, it can be said with confidence that at this point, each is doing what it can to discern the direction that it's viewers (it would be more than somewhat incorrect to refer to us as "readers" of those magazines I don't even read the pictorial titlesâ¦) are going. We use acid-free papers and canvases with archival inks to guarantee that your prints last a lifetime without fading or loss of color.Those magazines/companies aren't leading the country anywhere. All of our prints are produced on state-of-the-art, professional-grade Epson printers. Pixels Canvas Prints is one of the largest, most-respected giclee printing companies in the world with over 40 years of experience producing museum-quality prints. Stretched canvas prints look beautiful with or without frames. All stretched canvases ship within 3 - 4 business days and arrive "ready to hang" with pre-attached hanging wire, mounting hooks, and nails. Your image gets printed on one of our premium canvases and then stretched on a wooden frame of 1.5" x 1.5" stretcher bars (gallery wrap) or 5/8" x 5/8" stretcher bars (museum wrap). Also available with black sides, whites sides, and 5/8" stretcher bars.īring your artwork to life with the texture and depth of a stretched canvas print. Corner Detail: Stretched canvas print with 1.5" stretcher bars and mirrored image sides.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |